When does consensual sex become rape on promise to marry

This pertains to the programme counterpoint on Manorama Channel of 27th July 2017.

The discussion was totally misandric to say the least. The lady Shahina was totally feministic and her comment that in a long relationship of consensual sex between a man and a woman, the moment the woman’s mind decides a consensual sexual incident as rape, everyone has to acknowledge  the same is pure evil and extreme form of female chauvinism.  She  also has made a blatant lie that 498A has been made non compoundable. She further lies  that  the Supreme court’s  lenient views on 498A is not based on any data. Please read what the supreme court has to say on this as well as the data on the same.

“Crime in India 2012 Statistics” published by National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs shows arrest of 1,97,762 persons all over India during the year 2012 for offence under Section 498-A of the IPC, 9.4% more than the year 2011. Nearly a quarter of those arrested under this provision in 2012 were women i.e. 47,951 which depicts that mothers and sisters of the husbands were liberally included in their arrest net. Its share is 6% out of the total persons arrested under the crimes committed under Indian Penal Code. It accounts for 4.5% of total crimes committed under different sections of penal code, more than any other crimes excepting theft and hurt. The rate of charge-sheeting in cases under Section 498A, IPC is as high as 93.6%, while the conviction rate is only 15%, which is lowest across all heads. As many as 3,72,706 cases are pending trial of which on current estimate, nearly 3,17,000 are likely to result in acquittal”.

From the above, it is very clear how much of suffering of the innocents has been unleashed due to this legislation alone. Her comments  show   the depths to which feminists  plunge to achieve  their narcissts and chauvanistic agenda. What we, humanists are fighting for is not to get the 498a made non cognizable, but to make it bailable. We, MRAs have achieved  significant success  in this as evidenced by Supreme court’s ruling yesterday that arrest can happen in 498a only after the complaint has been seen through by local panels to see whether it is false or not.

http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/set-up-panels-to-curb--false-dowry-cases-sc.html

Shahina also made a very valid feministic point which us MRAs always have been saying are the root cause for such ‘laws’. She speaks the language of hate by saying  that men can suffer now, obviously referring to the case of a male reporter of Mathrubhumi being booked for rape even though it is clear the lady and the man were in a relation and had consensual sex. She says that as the world today is a patriarchial society and men laid the social rules, men have to suffer today for the false accusations and the resultant incarceration and punishment  they are made to suffer by woman. This is exactly what we are saying. The laws such as 498A, DV, anti rape law are hate laws formulated in the totally biased way as we see today is the handiwork of active lobbying by feminists by ways fair and foul to vent their man hate  or misandry as Shahina so eloquently quipped in Counterpoint. Such evil provisions in the anti rape law is also bound to go as they  take away the human rights of all men and are as such  inhuman and evil.

Seeing the face of a single male in the panel (a rather hilarious  attempt to make the panel seem democratic and reasonable) and his laughable attempt to side up  with the feminists reminded  us of the faces of Khurshid Anwar and Tarun Tejpal. I will say no more and will leave it at that….

The anchor has been seriously exposed as an out and out feminist whose sole role in this ‘discussion’ was to favor with the other feminists in the show in their inhuman remarks that a man can be labelled a rapist and arrested by the mere unverified utterances of a woman even after the woman having consensual sex with him. And aren’t we broadcasting this in Kerala, where the people are familiar with the Rajeenas, the Sarithas, the Shalus, the Anushanthis… and the first goonda woman Shobhana John. Aren’t we living in a country where the Aushantis and the Indrani Mukherjis kill their own daughters to cling on to their lust either for sex or for money? Then, on what basis do we frame laws where the only unverified words of a woman becomes sufficient to incarcerate a man?

Feminism stands exposed today as a movement of hatred, bigotry, immorality and  unethical practices. The channel could refrain from such biased programmes since people have seen through the bluff and bluster of feminism and looks down upon it. To conclude, I am reminded of a piece floating around on twitter yesterday, it read something like “ When a woman goes back on promise to marry, she becomes an empowered woman, when a man does the same, he becomes a rapist….”.