This pertains to the programme counterpoint on Manorama Channel of 27th July 2017.
The
discussion was totally misandric to say the least. The lady Shahina was totally
feministic and her comment that in a long relationship of consensual sex
between a man and a woman, the moment the woman’s mind decides a consensual
sexual incident as rape, everyone has to acknowledge the same is pure evil and extreme form of female
chauvinism. She also has made a blatant lie that 498A has
been made non compoundable. She further lies
that the Supreme court’s lenient views on 498A is not based on any
data. Please read what the supreme court has to say on this as well as the data
on the same.
“Crime in India 2012
Statistics” published by National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home
Affairs shows arrest of 1,97,762 persons all over India during the year 2012
for offence under Section 498-A of the IPC, 9.4% more than the year 2011.
Nearly a quarter of those arrested under this provision in 2012 were women i.e.
47,951 which depicts that mothers and sisters of the husbands were liberally
included in their arrest net. Its share is 6% out of the total persons arrested
under the crimes committed under Indian Penal Code. It accounts for
4.5% of total crimes committed under different sections of penal code, more
than any other crimes excepting theft and hurt. The rate of charge-sheeting in
cases under Section 498A, IPC is as high as 93.6%, while the conviction
rate is only 15%, which is lowest across all heads. As many as 3,72,706 cases
are pending trial of which on current estimate, nearly 3,17,000 are likely to
result in acquittal”.
From the above, it is very clear how much of
suffering of the innocents has been unleashed due to this legislation alone.
Her comments show the depths to which feminists plunge to achieve their narcissts and chauvanistic agenda. What
we, humanists are fighting for is not to get the 498a made non cognizable, but
to make it bailable. We, MRAs have achieved
significant success in this as evidenced
by Supreme court’s ruling yesterday that arrest can happen in 498a only after
the complaint has been seen through by local panels to see whether it is false
or not.
Shahina
also made a very valid feministic point which us MRAs always have been saying
are the root cause for such ‘laws’. She speaks the language of hate by saying that men can suffer now, obviously referring
to the case of a male reporter of Mathrubhumi being booked for rape even though
it is clear the lady and the man were in a relation and had consensual sex. She
says that as the world today is a patriarchial society and men laid the social
rules, men have to suffer today for the false accusations and the resultant
incarceration and punishment they are
made to suffer by woman. This is exactly what we are saying. The laws such as
498A, DV, anti rape law are hate laws formulated in the totally biased way as we see today is
the handiwork of active lobbying by feminists by ways fair and foul to vent
their man hate or misandry as Shahina so
eloquently quipped in Counterpoint. Such evil provisions in the anti rape law
is also bound to go as they take away
the human rights of all men and are as such inhuman and evil.
Seeing
the face of a single male in the panel (a rather hilarious attempt to make the panel seem democratic and
reasonable) and his laughable attempt to side up with the feminists reminded us of the faces of Khurshid Anwar and Tarun
Tejpal. I will say no more and will leave it at that….
The
anchor has been seriously exposed as an out and out feminist whose sole role in
this ‘discussion’ was to favor with the other feminists in the show in their
inhuman remarks that a man can be labelled a rapist and arrested by the mere
unverified utterances of a woman even after the woman having consensual sex
with him. And aren’t we broadcasting this in Kerala, where the people are
familiar with the Rajeenas, the Sarithas, the Shalus, the Anushanthis… and the first goonda woman Shobhana John. Aren’t
we living in a country where the Aushantis and the Indrani Mukherjis kill their
own daughters to cling on to their lust either for sex or for money? Then, on
what basis do we frame laws where the only unverified words of a woman becomes
sufficient to incarcerate a man?
Feminism stands exposed today as a movement of
hatred, bigotry, immorality and
unethical practices. The channel could refrain from such biased
programmes since people have seen through the bluff and bluster of feminism and
looks down upon it. To conclude, I am reminded of a piece floating around on
twitter yesterday, it read something like “ When a woman goes back on promise
to marry, she becomes an empowered woman, when a man does the same, he becomes a rapist….”.
