Marital Rape -  The hidden truth behind Feminist lies

Non-consensual sex in marriage, now bottled by female chauvanists as ‘marital rape’ can be committed by both husbands as well as by wives. If this has to become law, then it follows that such a law has to be gender neutral.

Some female chauvanists questions the government of India, thus “Is it not a violation of  a woman’s fundamental right, when her husband can be exonerated of raping her simply because there is no law to prosecute him?” May we ask, if non-consensual sex in a marriage is rape, then isn’t a husband also being raped when an unwilling husband is forced to perform sex? Isn’t the right of a man violated then? Should  the dignity of a man as a human being  evaporate just because he is married?

It is true that Marital rape has been criminalized by several countries. But in all such, the crime is addressed as a gender neutral one. Let us take the case of the USA, in the state of Ohio, marital rape is addressed thus  “No person shall engage in sexual conduct with another when the offender purposely compels the other person to submit by force or threat of force."  See, it is completely gender neutral. Similarly, Maryland law states that, if the spouses are living together, a prosecution can take place only if the accused "uses force or threat of force and the act is without the consent of the spouse."

Domestic violence act and cruelty against woman law i.e IPC  498A are one sided and biased legislations which have resulted in the ruining of entire families. This is due to false cases being hoisted on the husbands by wives since 498A has the unique position in law where a man is pronounced guilty until proven innocent - on the mere unverified words of a woman. The supreme court has come down heavily on the misuse of this law by women and had ruled that any complaint apart from one which sites grave injury should be cleared by a citizen’s council first . So much so for the image of Indian woman as truthful angels.

Also, in both DV act and 498A there is adequate protection for woman against any kind of violence by husbands. Then, why this new marital rape law? In India where woman have been known to blatantly misuse woman favouring laws which do not have any penal clause for misuse, criminalising non-consensual sex in marriage as rape,  termed as 'marital rape' is a regressive step.

There has been a sudden spurt of activity in the online media immediately after the government had filed an affidavit in High court stating that criminalizing marital rape was neither necessary nor possible in the current scenario. The ‘Indian Express’ itself had published close to 10 articles on the same generally voicing the demands of the feminists. The Quint, The wire, Firstpost etc have been hyper active immediately after this and have published reams and reams of publications supporting the criminalization. Is there an agenda in it? I am reminded of what Swathi Maliwal, the chairperson of DCW had to say about funding of protests after the Nirbhaya incident. She stated in a letter, generally commenting on the work of her predecessor thus, that  "a staggering Rs 2.9 lakh was spent just to ferry crowds to the event in a manner which is befitting only of political parties and not a statutory body”. MHA reports also has accused Indira Jaisinghs’s NGO of using foreign funds for lobbying with parliamentarians for making woman leaning laws and had banned the NGO for misusing foreign funds spending them on  non intended purposes.  Is foreign money  being spent on this campaign also by feminists ?

This sudden hyperactivity of feminists for criminalizing non-consensual sex in marriage is a direct result of the diminished harassment value of 498A towards men due to the recent supreme court ruling. A better way of harassing husbands would be to criminalise non-consensual sex in marriage, since as the law stands today, only woman can file such complaint and  the jail term for this is  seven years, whereas for 498A it is only three. For a country reeling under false cases hoisted on husbands by wives due to biased and ill framed laws on which even the Supreme court is critical about, one more such law will totally break the family structure in this country with dire consequence for future generations. 

498A battered. Seriously!!! Why Shalini Nairs's Article is worth a laugh and more.

After reading this article in The Indian Express titled 498A battered, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/498a-battered-supreme-court-misuse-of-dowry-law-women-harassment-cruelty-sneha-sharma-allahabad-hc-4794220/, I felt compelled to write this since most of her arguments were totally wrong and highly misandric.

Feminists are on an overdrive, since they have been given a small pinch on their ears by the Supreme Court like we elders do to misbehaving kids - to remind them that society does not believe them anymore especially in the case of 498A. For all this author's  melodrama of how woman are suffering due to battery by husbands, she does not anywhere give any indication on why such consternation when the SC had only wanted the complaints to be checked for prima facie truthfulness  and not for the law to be scrapped - as it rightly should.

She goes on to quote NFHS3 survey. These surveys have only woman as the sample points in the study and no men are interviewed for the same. This has been pointed out by MRAs for long. For instance, question is asked to woman on  how many times  a husband has hit her. But the same question is never asked to men whether wives have hit them. Then, what credibility is there in such results derived from such surveys. It has been a sick strategy of feminists - to make a base premise made on questionable surveys and then build a case based on such premise.

 An article published in 'The Wire' was written by another feminist journo with conclusions drawn  on a survey carried out by some organisation called  Vimochana on misuse of 498A. She goes on to say that the survey is unpublished. How can any responsible journalist or a journal base their arguments  on an 'unpublished survey'. We have misgivings as to whether such a survey really took place in the first place.If it had really taken place, then there would  be  results in the survey which are unpalatable to the feminists and are against their feminist interests. That may be the only reason why such a survey if it exists is  even now unpublished.

Without going any further on the arguments put up by this author, let us see what the former president of the Republic of India, that too a woman, has to say on this subject. Smt Pratibha Patil says

 "Another disquieting trend has been that women themselves have not been innocent of abusing women. At times women have played an unsavory, catalytic role in perpetrating violence whether against the daughter-in-law, the mother-in-law or female domestic helps. Instances exist whereby protective legal provisions for the benefit of women have been subjected to distortion and misuse to wreak petty vengeance and to settle scores. Some surveys have concluded that 6 to 10 percent of dowry complaints are false and were registered primarily to settle scores. It is unfortunate if laws meant to protect women get abused as instruments of oppression." 

So, the honourable President of the Republic of India is convinced, based on surveys, that 6 to 10 percent of dowry complaints are false.This is not the cases where courts decides to let free the  accused because the prosecution cannot prove the case. But what Smt. Pratibha Patil is referring to are the cases where it has been proved that such cases are false.  Taking the average 8 % as proved false cases, then also we have around 15000 proved false cases being registered every year. Which means, a minimum 15000 men are being incarcerated without trial every year based on this law, on the mere unverified demands of a wife. Not only them, their relatives from two year old kids up to 90 year old grand parents are routinely incarcerated with them. 

The person who seems to have  taken a serious affront to the Supreme court judgement seems to be Indira Jaisingh, a noted feminist and the additional Solicitor General in the Congress government. Jaisingh has been chastised by the MHA reports in the FCRA violation cases in which she is a serial accused. MHA report has this to say about her and actions of her NGO.  " Rs 88,978 was paid to Delhi Network of Positive People on October 21, 2009 for paying 250 people for holding a dharna outside the Law Ministry”. It further reported that “The MHA inspection team found that a large part of the money was spent on activities which were outside the list of items for which it had been collected. Paying volunteers to organise dharnas, receiving foreign contributions while working for the government, sending foreign donations outside India, spending foreign money to lobby with parliamentarians are some of the main violations listed in the report.”TOI further reported “The report says Rs 13 lakh was spent on media and advocacy with 67 MPs in April 2010 and 99 MPs in August 2010”.

So, the moot point - what credibility is there for what such people say? 

The question to be asked now is without even allowing  a person to utter a word in his defence, can the state arrest a man and his relatives in a scenario where more than 15000 proven false cases are being filed every year? Is  such a stance correct  for a democracy whose bounden responsibility is the protection of  human rights of it's citizens? 

The legislature is the true culprit succumbing  to the lobbying of the feminist and not coming to the protection of the citizens by amending 498A -  eyeing the woman vote bank. It is a crying shame that the Supreme court of the country itself is forced to step in when such gross violation of human rights of the citizens becomes a daily affair. It is all the more shameful that articles like this tries to drive wedges in the efforts of the Supreme court to provide justice to the citizens of this nation.

    

When does consensual sex become rape on promise to marry

This pertains to the programme counterpoint on Manorama Channel of 27th July 2017.

The discussion was totally misandric to say the least. The lady Shahina was totally feministic and her comment that in a long relationship of consensual sex between a man and a woman, the moment the woman’s mind decides a consensual sexual incident as rape, everyone has to acknowledge  the same is pure evil and extreme form of female chauvinism.  She  also has made a blatant lie that 498A has been made non compoundable. She further lies  that  the Supreme court’s  lenient views on 498A is not based on any data. Please read what the supreme court has to say on this as well as the data on the same.

“Crime in India 2012 Statistics” published by National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs shows arrest of 1,97,762 persons all over India during the year 2012 for offence under Section 498-A of the IPC, 9.4% more than the year 2011. Nearly a quarter of those arrested under this provision in 2012 were women i.e. 47,951 which depicts that mothers and sisters of the husbands were liberally included in their arrest net. Its share is 6% out of the total persons arrested under the crimes committed under Indian Penal Code. It accounts for 4.5% of total crimes committed under different sections of penal code, more than any other crimes excepting theft and hurt. The rate of charge-sheeting in cases under Section 498A, IPC is as high as 93.6%, while the conviction rate is only 15%, which is lowest across all heads. As many as 3,72,706 cases are pending trial of which on current estimate, nearly 3,17,000 are likely to result in acquittal”.

From the above, it is very clear how much of suffering of the innocents has been unleashed due to this legislation alone. Her comments  show   the depths to which feminists  plunge to achieve  their narcissts and chauvanistic agenda. What we, humanists are fighting for is not to get the 498a made non cognizable, but to make it bailable. We, MRAs have achieved  significant success  in this as evidenced by Supreme court’s ruling yesterday that arrest can happen in 498a only after the complaint has been seen through by local panels to see whether it is false or not.

http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/set-up-panels-to-curb--false-dowry-cases-sc.html

Shahina also made a very valid feministic point which us MRAs always have been saying are the root cause for such ‘laws’. She speaks the language of hate by saying  that men can suffer now, obviously referring to the case of a male reporter of Mathrubhumi being booked for rape even though it is clear the lady and the man were in a relation and had consensual sex. She says that as the world today is a patriarchial society and men laid the social rules, men have to suffer today for the false accusations and the resultant incarceration and punishment  they are made to suffer by woman. This is exactly what we are saying. The laws such as 498A, DV, anti rape law are hate laws formulated in the totally biased way as we see today is the handiwork of active lobbying by feminists by ways fair and foul to vent their man hate  or misandry as Shahina so eloquently quipped in Counterpoint. Such evil provisions in the anti rape law is also bound to go as they  take away the human rights of all men and are as such  inhuman and evil.

Seeing the face of a single male in the panel (a rather hilarious  attempt to make the panel seem democratic and reasonable) and his laughable attempt to side up  with the feminists reminded  us of the faces of Khurshid Anwar and Tarun Tejpal. I will say no more and will leave it at that….

The anchor has been seriously exposed as an out and out feminist whose sole role in this ‘discussion’ was to favor with the other feminists in the show in their inhuman remarks that a man can be labelled a rapist and arrested by the mere unverified utterances of a woman even after the woman having consensual sex with him. And aren’t we broadcasting this in Kerala, where the people are familiar with the Rajeenas, the Sarithas, the Shalus, the Anushanthis… and the first goonda woman Shobhana John. Aren’t we living in a country where the Aushantis and the Indrani Mukherjis kill their own daughters to cling on to their lust either for sex or for money? Then, on what basis do we frame laws where the only unverified words of a woman becomes sufficient to incarcerate a man?

Feminism stands exposed today as a movement of hatred, bigotry, immorality and  unethical practices. The channel could refrain from such biased programmes since people have seen through the bluff and bluster of feminism and looks down upon it. To conclude, I am reminded of a piece floating around on twitter yesterday, it read something like “ When a woman goes back on promise to marry, she becomes an empowered woman, when a man does the same, he becomes a rapist….”. 

The Abuse Of Gender Biased Laws In India

The Abuse Of Gender Biased Laws In India

The filing of false cases against husbands/men by women are on the increase day by day. This is the direct outcome of gender biased laws framed in India such as the dowry law and the domestic violence act. Such laws have been crudely formed and is totally biased towards woman. What is appalling about these laws is that there is absolutely no redressal mechanism for the man even if heaven and earth knows that the man is innocent and the woman had filed such a case for devilish ulterior motives such as getting even for petty matters, extracting money, or even to have an extra marital affair.

Let us consider for a moment what situation can warrant such a legislation. Perhaps the following dramatized and hypothetical situation could best suit the situation. A village somewhere in interior part of India. The society is heavily patriarchial. The husband is a landlord and she is his n^th wife. She cannot question any action of his. If questioned, she is mercilessly beaten. After such a beating  for having questioned him for bringing different woman to the house and having sex in front of her, she decides to report her physical torture and mental agony to the local police station. The poor defenceless woman while in the station is molested and no complaint is registered and she returns home….to further harassment and torture.

Perhaps laws such as dowry law and the Domestic violence Act in the current form (with no redressal mechanisms and you are guilty until proved innocent) may be justifiable in the situation dramatized above. Is this the condition of most of our women in society today. Are they so defenceless as the  story  described . In the metros are’nt woman having all the rights as equivalent or more than men, are’nt they earning well and are financially independent…?

In the hands of the majority of women today these laws are turning slowly into weapons of mass intimidation to the males and his relatives.

According to these legislations, the following is a list of women’s rights:

1. the right to control and subjugate the male partner
2. The right to publicly humiliate and physically abuse the male partner and his entire family
3. The right to divest the male partner of all his money and property
4. The right to send the male partner and his entire family to jail on her whims and fancies
5. The right to force the male partner to be a slave to her family
6. The right to kick out the male partner from HIS house at her will
7. The right to commit adultery (and send the male partner to jail if he dares object)
8. The right to kill an unborn child regardless of the male’s partner’s wishes
9. The right to have all “rights” and no responsibilities

In Indian society from traditions handed over from generation after generation, the male has several responsibilities to be fulfilled in the family. He is the head of the family with responsibility to provide food, security and money to the family. His role is that of provider and protector. He has to shoulder heavy responsibilities in the family and naturally will need certain   powers and privileges to discharge his responsibilities. When certain problems arise in the family, the man will have to take moderating steps to rectify the same, sometimes against the like, wishes or whims of his wife. Any such action taken (even if it is for a very good intention) can be construed as constituting domestic violence as per the DV act. If the wife so desires, she can even restrain him from looking after his parents. Then how can he manage the family life entrusted to his care?. Hence several provisions in the DV act is directly harmful to the established family structure in India.

When this act was formulated, all good meaning people had welcomed the same, thinking that no  woman would go to such low extends and abuse a law which has been framed entirely for the good of womankind. We had always envisioned woman to be virtuous and righteous. Sadly, time has proved us wrong. Now the purported abuser has turned the abused Not only have even educated and woman in very high and responsible positions turned to abusing  these laws, some woman have gone to the extent that they have even falsely accused fathers of raping daughters and in one case the lady even went to the extent of saying that the daughter had given birth to a child by the father. When medical examination of the daughter was done, it came to light that the daughter had never conceived nor had ever given birth (such a case had happened in kerala, and reported heavily in the media. When finally it was proved that such a thing had never happened, sadly no action was taken against the false accuser i.e his wife). In most cases, these vindictive woman send to jail their husbands old (in some cases 90 year old) mother-in-laws and father-in-laws, brother-in-laws and sister-in-laws to either just get sadistic pleasure of getting even, or to usurp as much as money as possible from the husband or to simply spite the husband and his family.

This abuse  has reached a  point when parents (who know about these woman centric laws) are really thinking twice about marriage for their sons. It would be good if more and parents become sufficiently educated about these gender biased laws. Boys also need to be educated about these laws and should allow them the scope to decide about their marriage considering the fact how adversely these laws could affect them in leading a normal and life with dignity.

Sadly media is showing and discussing these issues in a lopsided manner. Universally, media is always with the weak and the oppressed. In this case, the media  have not realized or feigning not to recognize that man is the oppressed in these situations. Also, men in some TV discussions on related topics do not voice their views properly thinking that their view points would be construed as them not being  progressive and being incapable to fend for themselves and thought of as being weak and hen pecked. Many times, they sit as dimwits through the show and nod their heads to any and every atrocious comments (even to the comment of the NCW that alimony should be granted to wife even if the husband does not have payment capacity and even if wife is adulterous).

Here the working of the NCW is worth mentioning. An organization formulated solely for the upliftment of woman is slowly degenerating into an organization whose sole concern seem to be only to promulgate misandry. This hatred towards men can be seen in various sections of law being drawn up by the commission. Not only do these woman draw up laws to ‘uplift’ or protect woman, they in the process try every gimmick to see that sections are added so that every man is denuded of almost all his rights and in the process forcing him to obey all of his wife’s  diktats. Notable among the recommendations are the following two:

• It will henceforth become the “duty” of a man to provide maintenance to his wife and children irrespective of the fact if he has sufficient means.
• Definition of a wife needs to be changed to include women who have lived with a man in a relation of marriage.

How stupid and in some view malicious is the intentions. How can a man pay alimony when he does not have sufficient funds to do so. Should he sell his body or should he go for prostitution. The second recommendation is even more evil. By this, the NCW is giving a clean chit to woman to commit adultery without any fear – fear of the law or any kind of action by the poor husband. The NCW is duping people  by fudging data on the number of complaints, the number of registered crime against woman etc etc in order to get popular support to aid them draft and implement these draconian laws.

Over the centuries man has contributed heavily in all spheres of life to take mankind to where it is today. Even today, man as head of family does the most dangerous and taxing jobs for the family. But feminists organizations are working overtime to see that these efforts are not recognized in society by highlighting certain shortcomings especially in the sexual front for men and choosing to ignore or trivializing their massive contributions. They conveniently brush aside the fact that men on a regular basis are ready to lay down even their lives for their families especially for the female members of the family when any danger accosts them. Today  more and more married men are succumbing to pressures and fears and committing suicide since they cannot face the ignominy of going to jail and facing society afterwards – for no fault of theirs.

Time has finally come when men and right thinking women  realise that unless they fight these draconian laws the next generation will not see the family as it is today. These laws, especially the anti dowry law and the DV act should be at the very least be modified that if any  accusation is proved to be false and purposely done to harm the accused, then the accuser should get punishment atleast to the extent  of the accused  crime. For instance, if a person accuses being raped by another and her/his accusation is found to be false and of malicious intent, then she/he should be jailed for the same number of years as of a person convicted of rape abuse.  Only if such redressal mechanisms are in place will society see  laws being executed in a  gender neutral manner upholding the dignity of  every individual in the process.

A woman can do no wrong..?

                                                           

The term criminal conjures up visions of sneering men with rippling muscles, strapping tall with multiple scars on the face. But nowadays in Kerala such men are usually at the receiving end of criminal activity and the criminals are ‘tender’ woman in their early twenties hardly anything to go by way of physique. One sided laws like the dowry laws and domestic violence act  were  made with the sole assumption that woman can do no wrong. Is that so…? Read along to find out.

Take a flash back to a couple of years and you have a wisp of woman by the name of Shobha John who was into blackmail by abducting the thantri of a renowned shrine and forcibly taking his  photographs in compromising positions with a consenting woman.

The bespectacled, lean lady catapulted to fame with the infamous Thanthri case. But her real claim to fame rests in one another title “ First  lady in the state to be arrested under the Goonda act”. She is said to be running  a network of ‘business’ from massage parlors to real estate allegedly as a front to various illicit activities. Behind the curtains, she is said to have been managing a dreaded world of crime, ranging from flesh trade to contract killing. Venues and ventures may change, but the USP of her scheme of things remains unchanged, that is blackmailing.

Take the Thanthri case for example. Not knowing it to be a perfectly laid trap, Thanthi Kandhararu Mohnaru enters into one of the flats in Link Laxman apartments of Valanjambalam, Cochin where a  sex worker has been waiting for him, arranged by his trusted friend Sobha john. While Thanthri and his partner are on bed a group of people allegedly barged in to the room and took photographs. They demand a huge amount for not making the photographs public, to which, at the insistence of Shobha, the thanthri agrees first. Had it not been for the crucial decision of the Thanthri to retain his wealth at the cost of his name and fame the case wouldn’t have reached public domain.

After the Thanthri episode it took three years for her name to surface again in news indicating that  all the time she had not been sitting idle. This time she was booked in connection with the murder of a youth named Althara Vineesh. The murder was committed by a gang led by  Keppan Ani. Both the murdered and murderer  were notorious gangsters, with the latter being right hand man of Shobha. Investigations proved  Shobha’s role in the conspiracy and giving shelter to the accused persons.

After a gap of 5 years Shobha is back. This time she finds herself in the wanted list in connection with a sex racket case. The case is now famous as Varappuzha sex racket case. Further, investigators are believed to have got links that may connect her to another case of the same kind , the Paravoor case.

Bhaskara Karnavar, a U.S. returnee, was found murdered in his house at Cheriyanadu in Chengannur on the morning of November 8, 2009. Sherin, an erstwhile college beauty, wife of Karanavar's second son Binu, was arrested within two days while the other three, who were allegedly friends of Sherin and who were contracted to kill Karanavar after he cancelled a property will in Sherin's name, were nabbed from Karnataka. Sherin, was given bail by the High Court, but was shifted to jail on account of her conviction. She had conspired to kill her father in law for his wealth. It seems Karnavar had favoured her earlier but on seeing her loose way of life, had decided to take her out of his will while bequeathing his property.

Recently, a beautiful college going girl, Mithra Susan Abraham had turned almost into a murderer when she lured a youth with womanly promises into the hands of a supari gang commonly called quotation gangs. The back ground of the case is as follows. A youth C Liju, was brutally assaulted in Ranni, Pathanamthitta district on August 5 by a gang. The probe into this incident has taken the police to the St Joseph College Campus, where they uncovered the involvement of a 20 year old girl and two boys, her classmates, in the conspiracy. Police said that, Mithra Susan Abraham, 3rd year Travel and Tourism student of St Thomas College, Ranni allegedly lured Liju, into the trap of a supari Gang. Liju was critically injured but survived

More recently, there was a case of a woman who went into a jewellery shop in Alapuzha under the pretext of buying jewellery for her marriage. After selecting a sizable amount of gold, she took it for billing. When no one was noticing, she snatched the jewellery box and ran out. The alert security guard, chased and with the help of passers-by caught her.

A bank robbery this. The main accused in the bank robbery in Chelambara in Kerala, where the robbers decamped with jewellery of about 80 million indian rupees, is a woman. The four member gang cut a hole in the strong room floor of the Gramin bank after taking for rent the ground floor directly under the bank’s strong room. This is the biggest robbery in terms of value in Kerala.

And for sex you cannot beat this. A fourteen year girl was subjected to rape and prostitution by none other than the girls’s father and mother. Infamously known as the Paravur Case, the father mother duo was taking the child around the country and subjecting her to sex with more than hundred people. The father was convicted and sentenced to ten years life imprisonment and the mother was sentenced to seven years life imprisonment.

Kiliroor sex scandal case is another  case where a teenage girl Shari was taken to different places in kerala and was allegedly sexually exploited by “influential persons”. What is more shocking is that the main accused Latha Nair, is Shari’s own mother’s sister.

Ice Cream Parlour Sex Case is a case where one Sreedevi was running an ice cream parlour in Calicut, Kerala and was a regular supplier of girls to influential people. What gave this case notoriety was that it was alleged that prominent politicians were involved in the case. However, the main accused in this also is a woman.

The main accused in the case of woman trafficking using fake passport to the gulf and forced into sex trade there is a woman, Lissy Sajan of Trichur. Lissy had a flourishing flesh trade in the gulf and evaded arrest several times but was arrested from near the Aluva Bus Station recently. She is the kingpin of a racket which has involved among others two Superindents Of Police and several Sub Inspector Of Police who have hence been suspended from service.

Here is a case involving  fraud. The special CBI court has awarded 3 years imprisonment and Rs 30,000 fine to the accused in the SSLC question paper leak case. Bindu Vijayan  of  Vanchiyur, Trivandrum and Sindhu Surendran  of Chennai were given jail terms. The court had found them guilty on charges of criminal conspiracy, stealing and for keeping the stolen things under position., to top it all has co

Now the recent two developments can even beat a sleasze writers best imagination. Recently, kerala Assembly saw tumultuous scenes after the arrest of a woman, Saritha.S.Nair in a cheating case. It came to light that this woman with one Biju had swindled crores of rupees from very influential people with promises of share in installations of solar equipments and farms. The duo had the blessings of staff in the chief minister’s office , hence the ruckus in the assembly. The opposition claim is that this was all made possible because of the ‘involvement’ of this beautiful lady  with people who mattered in the government. Immediately the involvement of a M.L.A of the opposition in sordid sex activities was brought to light presumably by the ruling party. The clip of the MLA fornicating with the complaintant woman was telecast by different channels. What was shameful and shocking was that, this clip was shot by this woman herself keeping a hidden webcam. The woman in her complaint to the police had deposed that the MLA’s son had sex with her several times promising marriage. When she came to know that his son would not marry her, she induced/seduced   his father i.e the MLA into having sex with her and videographing the entire episode to get even with his son who incidentally was four years younger to her. She had wanted to get him trapped into getting arrested using the controversial provisions of the anti rape law knowing all too well that the MLA could be arrested on her complaint alone. All said and done, a sad day for womanhood.

It is to be noted at this juncture that  all of these women are normal middle class woman and none of them are poor. All of them are well educated too. We should reflect at this moment on the enormity of abuse capable at the hands of womenfolk in this country making use of the various woman centred laws . Please reflect that these self same woman detailed above  are also given protection under the  gender biased and one sided laws. These laws were formulated under the express belief that woman will never be able to do any wrong. How about these woman..?  Where they compelled to do any of these acts..under threat, poverty etc…? The conclusion should be - there are born criminals among woman too and their numbers are increasing day by day as woman are increasingly not tied to families and their homes.

Now reflect for a moment… If any one of them were wedded to your son and files a case of false Dowry Harassment or false Domestic Violence  or false case of  rape against your son, will your son stand a chance. No section in IPC or CrPC gives redressal for abuse of such laws. Please reflect on this. Do we require such draconian and one sided laws in our modern society. Please remember that such laws have no redressal mechanism for the accused. So, let us unite and fight these draconian and evil laws and also those who frame them.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------